MD BMG/roadmap: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Create a special website for MD tools | * Create a special website for MD tools | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
[http://wiki.opensfs.org/images/3/38/MdtestSummary.pdf mdtest summary] | We ran 3 of the benchmarks proposed with similar configurations so we can compare the benchmarks. We ran the tests on 2 Lustre FS : | ||
* First FS on 60 disk drives configured in 6 OST's with RAID-6 (8+2) and the MDT on a RAID-5 (4+1) flash devices | |||
* Second on 20 SSD drives configured in 2 OST's with RAID-6 (8+2) and the MDT on a RAID-5 (4+1) flash devices | |||
The results and some comments are in the pdf file format as follows: | |||
# [http://wiki.opensfs.org/images/3/38/MdtestSummary.pdf mdtest summary] | |||
# [http://wiki.opensfs.org/images/d/df/Postmark_Results.pdf Postmark summary] | |||
# [http://wiki.opensfs.org/images/d/d4/Netmist_Summary.pdf Netmist MPI summary] | |||
# [http://wiki.opensfs.org/images/4/46/LUG14_MPEE_BWG_OpenSFS.pdf Slides for LUG14] | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Please note that I used iostat for monitoring the utilization of the devices and that the metadata set was 3x larger than the cache size of the MDS. | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Return to [http://wiki.opensfs.org/MD_BMG Metadata Performance Evaluation] page. | Return to [http://wiki.opensfs.org/MD_BMG Metadata Performance Evaluation] page. |
Latest revision as of 08:00, 28 February 2014
- Collect benchmark tools candidates from OpenSFS
- Evaluate all the tools and the workloads that can benchmarked
- Recommend a small set of MD benchmark tools to cover the majority of MD workloads
- Collect stats from users of MD benchmarks
- Build scripts to allow ease of use of the recommended tools
- Write documentation for troubleshooting MD performance problems using the toolset
- Create a special website for MD tools
We ran 3 of the benchmarks proposed with similar configurations so we can compare the benchmarks. We ran the tests on 2 Lustre FS :
- First FS on 60 disk drives configured in 6 OST's with RAID-6 (8+2) and the MDT on a RAID-5 (4+1) flash devices
- Second on 20 SSD drives configured in 2 OST's with RAID-6 (8+2) and the MDT on a RAID-5 (4+1) flash devices
The results and some comments are in the pdf file format as follows:
Please note that I used iostat for monitoring the utilization of the devices and that the metadata set was 3x larger than the cache size of the MDS.
Return to Metadata Performance Evaluation page.