LWG Minutes 2016-10-05

From OpenSFS Wiki
Revision as of 07:30, 17 October 2016 by Jgmitter (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Attendance == Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn <br /> ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons <br /> Indiana: Ken Rawlings <br /> Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Attendance

Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn
ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons
Indiana: Ken Rawlings
Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter Jones

Actions

New Actions Captured:

  • None

Existing Open Actions:

  • None

Actions Recently Closed:

  • None

Minutes

2.9 Release Status/Update
Peter

  • The number of blockers is slightly up from last week, however, some are just interop issues due to recent landings.
  • The largest item to close out on is SSK development. There have been a number of suggestions for implementation change made by Intel security experts. Those changes have been made and are queued up for testing and landing.
  • Anything else to report from the community?
    • No word of any other focused 2.9 testing by the community due to other priorities.


2.10 Release Update
Peter

  • Once we branch when reaching code freeze for 2.9, we can begin looking at 2.10 landings.
  • There is a feature test plan template that cased be used for feature development in the 2.10 cycle.


Upstream Lustre Client
James

  • The 4.9 release is going to be a 2.7 client equivalent. There was ~120 patch delta between 2.6 to 2.7.
  • After the next merge window James is looking to try out 2.8 patches. James has had a rough look at ~1/4 of the code and there are ~40 patches thus far that will be needed.
  • Will the kernel go to 4.10 numbering after 4.9?
    • James: I believe that it will.


lustre.org
Ken

  • The Mediawiki upgrade is occurring.
  • We are getting close on the old wiki migration.
  • There are about 70 old architecture documents and there is uncertainty about how to handle them. The current plan is to preserve them as static pages.
    • Peter - I would be concerned about having stale references on the architecture page, but agree that we should keep it available. Perhaps the creation of a historical architecture documents area would be appropriate to retain the documents, but with a warning that data may be stale.
      • All present agree.


Other Business

  • Sarp: organizational changes in OpenSFS
    • We are now officially operating under a new set of bylaws and a new board composition.
    • The new board consists only of Lustre users (no vendors).
    • Sarp has accepted a role on the board and, therefore, is stepping away from the LWG co-chair role.
    • Dustin Leverman of ORNL will be taking on the co-char role as Sarp’s replacement.
    • A “save the date” announcement will be coming soon for LUG. The event will be hosted by Indiana University this year. More details to come in the announcement.
    • A reminder that the OpenSFS board meetings are open to the public and anyone can attend that is interested.


Next meeting will be on 2016-10-19