CDWG Minutes 2013-04-24

From OpenSFS Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Agenda

  • 2.4 status updates
  • Plan major thrust areas for CDWG for the coming year
  • 2.5 roadmap discussion (time permitting)

Attendance

  • Chris Morrone (LLNL)
  • Cory Spitz (Cray)
  • Peter Jones (Intel)
  • Nic Henke (Xyratex)
  • John Carrier (Cray)

Minutes

2.4 status updates

Things going not too bad. 11 blockers, 9 have fixes in flight. Overnight some glitch in results updloading, but things are moving through now.

Note that commit a585b03 "Revert "LU-2459 osd: add LMA incompat flag check" was needed to get tests passing again.

LU-2827 needs some attention if going to land for 2.4.0.

Cray started testing 2.3.64.

Cray suggests LU-1442 should be blocker. New patch and explanation of cause of bug available from Xyratex. Will evaluated for 2.4.0.

CDWG Thrust Area Planning

  • Improvement issue tracking
    • Improve transparency of decision making on issue priority
    • Know which issues will or will not be solved in a release
    • Transparently track landing of bug fixes for every
    • Increase visibility of non-feature work that is outstanding
  • Community Development Tree Contract revisions
    • Send your desired changes NOW!
    • Add maintenance tree funding?
  • Discuss and refine development cadence
  • Documentation effort
    • Lustre Manual
    • In code (doxygen)
    • In tree architecture documentation
  • Discuss/enact OpenSFS hosting of:
    • Lustre releases (e.g. yum repos. Make it easier for people to install lustre.)
    • OpenSFS build system
    • git+gerrit
  • Patch review
  • Establish release criteria (Cory)
    • Put obligation on OpenSFS to be part of the process?
    • Stability testing requirements
    • Performance characterization
    • OpenSFS needs to be more involved in creating the test plan
  • Get developers on the CDWG calls, try to improve transparency of Lustre planning