Difference between revisions of "2015-06-01 Protocols Document meeting minutes"

From OpenSFS Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Attendees ==
 
== Attendees ==
  
* Jacques-Charles Lafoucriere (CEA)  
+
* Olaf Faaland (LLNL)
* Richard Henwood (Intel)
+
* Chris Horn (Cray)
 
* Andrew Uselton (Intel)
 
* Andrew Uselton (Intel)
 
* Doug Ouchareck (Intel)
 
* Doug Ouchareck (Intel)
* Ruth Klundt (Sandia)
 
 
* Andreas Dilger (Intel)
 
* Andreas Dilger (Intel)
* Chris Horn (Cray)
+
* Peter Jones (Intel)
* Olaf Faaland (LLNL)
+
* Richard Henwood (Intel)
* Colin Faber (Seagate)
 
 
* Chris Morrone (LLNL)
 
* Chris Morrone (LLNL)
 +
* Ruth Klundt (Sandia)
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
 +
 +
=== Brief status ===
 +
 +
Since last meeting, a patch has been provided by Mike. Andreas, Doug, Jinshan have provided reviews:
 +
 +
http://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/project:doc/protocol
  
 
=== Expectations of Gerrit review and project workflow. ===
 
=== Expectations of Gerrit review and project workflow. ===
  
 +
The purpose of this discussion is about improving transparency for this project. It is difficult for observers to have an overview on project progress.
 +
 +
AR: Andrew to include more information in the commit message singling to viewers to patch status: Known issues, provenance of the information.
  
 
=== What can we accomplish with weekly meetings? ===
 
=== What can we accomplish with weekly meetings? ===
 +
 +
They are valuable tool while the project works through current progress concerns.
  
 
=== Other business. ===
 
=== Other business. ===
 +
 +
With no other business, meeting adjourned at 13:22 CST.

Revision as of 12:25, 1 June 2015


Attendees

  • Olaf Faaland (LLNL)
  • Chris Horn (Cray)
  • Andrew Uselton (Intel)
  • Doug Ouchareck (Intel)
  • Andreas Dilger (Intel)
  • Peter Jones (Intel)
  • Richard Henwood (Intel)
  • Chris Morrone (LLNL)
  • Ruth Klundt (Sandia)

Agenda

Brief status

Since last meeting, a patch has been provided by Mike. Andreas, Doug, Jinshan have provided reviews:

http://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/project:doc/protocol

Expectations of Gerrit review and project workflow.

The purpose of this discussion is about improving transparency for this project. It is difficult for observers to have an overview on project progress.

AR: Andrew to include more information in the commit message singling to viewers to patch status: Known issues, provenance of the information.

What can we accomplish with weekly meetings?

They are valuable tool while the project works through current progress concerns.

Other business.

With no other business, meeting adjourned at 13:22 CST.