LWG Minutes 2022-07-21: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "== Attendance == HPE: Cory Spitz, Olaf Weber <br /> ORNL: Dustin Leverman, James Simmons, Rick Mohr <br /> Whamcloud: Peter Jones <br /> == Actions == '''New Actions Captured...") |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Peter <br /> | Peter <br /> | ||
We'll get someone to look at that one | We'll get someone to look at that one | ||
Cory <br /> | |||
Would it be ok to upstream our LND | |||
Peter <br /> | |||
Yes of course, we already have the Geminini LND in the tree and would encourage others to do the same | |||
'''Upstream Lustre Client''' <br /> | '''Upstream Lustre Client''' <br /> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:37, 21 July 2022
Attendance
HPE: Cory Spitz, Olaf Weber
ORNL: Dustin Leverman, James Simmons, Rick Mohr
Whamcloud: Peter Jones
Actions
New Actions Captured:
- None
Existing Open Actions:
- None
Actions Recently Closed:
- None
Minutes
2.16.0 Release Update
Peter
Trying to land LUTF patches but failing janitor testing
James
Helping with LUTF patches; would like review on EC patch 47628
Peter
We'll get someone to look at that one
Cory
Would it be ok to upstream our LND
Peter
Yes of course, we already have the Geminini LND in the tree and would encourage others to do the same
Upstream Lustre Client
James
IPv6 work progressing well; need to need legacy support
Peter
Does it make sense to use the MR topic branch to test this work and then land in one go?
lustre.org
- Spam levels dropped considerably since security levels restored
Other Business
None
Next meeting will be on 2022-08-04 at 11:00am Pacific