Lustre Community Development in Progress - Revision history

Morrone at 18:39, 8 April 2015

2015-04-08T18:39:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 8 April 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Category:LWG]]~~
	This content [http://wiki.lustre.org/Projects has moved] to the [http://wiki.lustre.org official Lustre wiki].		This content [http://wiki.lustre.org/Projects has moved] to the [http://wiki.lustre.org official Lustre wiki].

Morrone: Replaced content with "Category:LWG This content [http://wiki.lustre.org/Projects has moved] to the [http://wiki.lustre.org official Lustre wiki]."

2015-04-08T18:38:54Z

Replaced content with "Category:LWG This content [http://wiki.lustre.org/Projects has moved] to the [http://wiki.lustre.org official Lustre wiki]."

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:38, 8 April 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:LWG]]		[[Category:LWG]]
	Features that are currently being developed for future Lustre releases. Features are not listed in priority or landing order. Projects not currently under development, or ideas for features, should be listed on the Project Ideas page.		This content [http://wiki.lustre.org/Projects has moved] to the [http://wiki.lustre.org official Lustre wiki].

	~~Please note that the targeted completion date information is provided by the developing organization for informational purposes only and is in no way a roadmap commitment.~~

	~~{\| class="wikitable sortable"~~
	\|-
	~~! Feature !! Feature Summary !! Point of Contact!! Tracker !! Target Date (YYYY-MM)!! Landed Release~~
	\|-
	\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| Andreas Dilger (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-
	\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (Seagate) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-
	\| LFSCK Phase 3 - DNE consistency \|\| Enhance LFSCK to work with DNE filesystems, including remote directory entries, and OST orphan handling for multiple MDTs. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2307 LU-2307] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .
	\|-
	\| DNE Phase IIb \|\| Asynchronous Commit of cross-MDT updates for improved performance. Remote rename and remote hard link functionality. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3534 LU-3534] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
	\|-
	\| Layout Enhancement \|\| Add support for multiple layouts on a single file, for File Level Replication, Data on MDT, extent-based layouts, etc. \|\| John Hammond (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3480 LU-3480] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-
	~~\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .~~
	\|-
	\| File Level Replication Phase 1 \|\| Solution Architecture and HDL, Exclusive Open, RAID 1 Layout, Layout Modification Method, Read Only RAID 1 \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-
	~~\| File Level Replication Phase 2 \|\| Immediate asynchronous write from client. \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .~~
	\|-
	~~\| Data on MDT \|\| Allow small files to be stored directly on the MDT for reduced RPC count and improved performance. \|\| ? (Intel) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .~~
	\|-
	~~\| Dynamic LNET Config \|\| Introduces a user space script which will read routes from a config file and add those routes to LNET dynamically with the lctl utility.~~ This ~~allows the support of very large routing tables \|\| Amir Shehata (Intel) \|\|~~ [~~https~~://~~jira~~.~~hpdd~~.~~intel.com~~/~~browse/LU-2456 LU-2456~~] ~~\|\| 2014-11 \|\| .~~
	\|-
	~~\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting~~ to ~~a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .~~
	\|-
	~~\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase~~ the ~~OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .~~
	\|-
	~~\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sébastien Buisson (Bull/Atos) \|\|~~ [~~https~~://~~jira~~.~~hpdd~~.~~intel.com/browse/LU-6356 LU-6356] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .~~
	\|-
	~~\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single~~ Lustre ~~filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .~~
	\|-
	\| Shared Key Crypto \|\| Allow node authentication and/or RPC encryption using symmetric shared key crypto with GSSAPI. Avoids complexity in configuring Kerberos across multiple domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3289 LU-3289] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .
	\|-
	\| Lock ahead \|\| Allow user space to request LDLM extent locks in advance of need. Intended to optimize shared file IO. \|\| Patrick Farrell (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6179 LU-6179] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-
	~~\| NRS Delay \|\| Use NRS for fault injection. Intentionally delay request processing to simulate server load. \|\| Chris Horn (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6283 LU-6283] \|\| 2015-04 \|\| .~~
	\|-
	\| Multiple modify RPCs \|\| Support of multiple slots per client (in last_rcvd file) for reply reconstruction of filesystem-modifying requests. Will improve the metadata operations performance of a single client \|\| Grégoire Pichon (Bull/Atos) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5319 LU-5319] ~~\|\| 2015-05 \|\|~~ .
	\|}

Pichong at 07:48, 2 April 2015

2015-04-02T07:48:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 2 April 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| ~~Sebastien~~ Buisson (Bull) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6356 LU-6356] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sébastien Buisson (Bull/Atos) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6356 LU-6356] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
Line 41:		Line 41:
	\|-		\|-
	\| NRS Delay \|\| Use NRS for fault injection. Intentionally delay request processing to simulate server load. \|\| Chris Horn (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6283 LU-6283] \|\| 2015-04 \|\| .		\| NRS Delay \|\| Use NRS for fault injection. Intentionally delay request processing to simulate server load. \|\| Chris Horn (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6283 LU-6283] \|\| 2015-04 \|\| .
			\|-
			\| Multiple modify RPCs \|\| Support of multiple slots per client (in last_rcvd file) for reply reconstruction of filesystem-modifying requests. Will improve the metadata operations performance of a single client \|\| Grégoire Pichon (Bull/Atos) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5319 LU-5319] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
	\|}		\|}

Pjones at 12:28, 18 March 2015

2015-03-18T12:28:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 18 March 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:
	\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting to a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting to a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (~~Intel/~~DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sebastien Buisson (Bull) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6356 LU-6356] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sebastien Buisson (Bull) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6356 LU-6356] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .

Pjones at 16:25, 11 March 2015

2015-03-11T16:25:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 11 March 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sebastien Buisson (Bull) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sebastien Buisson (Bull) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6356 LU-6356] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .

Pjones at 16:19, 11 March 2015

2015-03-11T16:19:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 11 March 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:
	\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting to a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting to a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| ~~2015~~-11 \|\| .		\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| ? (?) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| Sebastien Buisson (Bull) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .

Pjones at 16:17, 11 March 2015

2015-03-11T16:17:25Z

Morrone at 21:50, 9 March 2015

2015-03-09T21:50:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 9 March 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| Andreas Dilger (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| Andreas Dilger (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (~~Xyratex~~) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .		\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (Seagate) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| LFSCK Phase 3 - DNE consistency \|\| Enhance LFSCK to work with DNE filesystems, including remote directory entries, and OST orphan handling for multiple MDTs. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2307 LU-2307] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .		\| LFSCK Phase 3 - DNE consistency \|\| Enhance LFSCK to work with DNE filesystems, including remote directory entries, and OST orphan handling for multiple MDTs. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2307 LU-2307] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .

Morrone at 21:46, 9 March 2015

2015-03-09T21:46:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 9 March 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\| Layout Enhancement \|\| Add support for multiple layouts on a single file, for File Level Replication, Data on MDT, extent-based layouts, etc. \|\| John Hammond (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3480 LU-3480] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| Layout Enhancement \|\| Add support for multiple layouts on a single file, for File Level Replication, Data on MDT, extent-based layouts, etc. \|\| John Hammond (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3480 LU-3480] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| ~~2015~~-05 \|\| .		\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| File Level Replication Phase 1 \|\| Solution Architecture and HDL, Exclusive Open, RAID 1 Layout, Layout Modification Method, Read Only RAID 1 \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| File Level Replication Phase 1 \|\| Solution Architecture and HDL, Exclusive Open, RAID 1 Layout, Layout Modification Method, Read Only RAID 1 \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
Line 32:		Line 32:
	\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .		\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| ? (?) \|\| . \|\| ~~2015~~-05 \|\| .		\| Kerberos Revival \|\| Fix up existing Kerberos code so it is tested working again. \|\| ? (?) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| UID/GID mapping \|\| Map UID/GID for remote client nodes to local UID/GID on the MDS and OSS. Allows a single Lustre filesystem to be shared across clients with administrative domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3291 LU-3291] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
Line 38:		Line 38:
	\| Shared Key Crypto \|\| Allow node authentication and/or RPC encryption using symmetric shared key crypto with GSSAPI. Avoids complexity in configuring Kerberos across multiple domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3289 LU-3289] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .		\| Shared Key Crypto \|\| Allow node authentication and/or RPC encryption using symmetric shared key crypto with GSSAPI. Avoids complexity in configuring Kerberos across multiple domains. \|\| Stephen Simms (Indiana University) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3289 LU-3289] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Lock ahead \|\| Allow user space to request LDLM extent locks in advance of need. Intended to optimize shared file IO. \|\| Patrick Farrell (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6179 LU-6179] \|\| ?? \|\| .		\| Lock ahead \|\| Allow user space to request LDLM extent locks in advance of need. Intended to optimize shared file IO. \|\| Patrick Farrell (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6179 LU-6179] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| NRS Delay \|\| Use NRS for fault injection. Intentionally delay request processing to simulate server load. \|\| Chris Horn (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6283 LU-6283] \|\| 2015-04 \|\| .		\| NRS Delay \|\| Use NRS for fault injection. Intentionally delay request processing to simulate server load. \|\| Chris Horn (Cray) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6283 LU-6283] \|\| 2015-04 \|\| .
	\|}		\|}

Morrone at 21:44, 9 March 2015

2015-03-09T21:44:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 9 March 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	! Feature !! Feature Summary !! Point of Contact!! Tracker !! Target Date (YYYY-MM)!! Landed Release		! Feature !! Feature Summary !! Point of Contact!! Tracker !! Target Date (YYYY-MM)!! Landed Release
	\|-		\|-
	\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| ? (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ~~2015~~-11 \|\| .		\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| Andreas Dilger (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (Xyratex) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .		\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (Xyratex) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| File Level Replication Phase 1 \|\| Solution Architecture and HDL, Exclusive Open, RAID 1 Layout, Layout Modification Method, Read Only RAID 1 \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ~~2015~~-11 \|\| .		\| File Level Replication Phase 1 \|\| Solution Architecture and HDL, Exclusive Open, RAID 1 Layout, Layout Modification Method, Read Only RAID 1 \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| File Level Replication Phase 2 \|\| Immediate asynchronous write from client. \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ~~2016~~-05 \|\| .		\| File Level Replication Phase 2 \|\| Immediate asynchronous write from client. \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Data on MDT \|\| Allow small files to be stored directly on the MDT for reduced RPC count and improved performance. \|\| ? (Intel) \|\| . \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .		\| Data on MDT \|\| Allow small files to be stored directly on the MDT for reduced RPC count and improved performance. \|\| ? (Intel) \|\| . \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 11 March 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| Andreas Dilger (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| Patchless Server \|\| Remove Lustre kernel patches to allow Lustre servers to be more easily ported to new kernels, and to be built against vendor kernels without changing the vendor kernel RPMs. \|\| Andreas Dilger (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-20 LU-20] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (Seagate) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| ~~2015~~-11 \|\| .		\| End-to-End Data Integrity with T10 \|\| Add a path to pass T10 Protection Information from Lustre clients through to server disks to reduce CPU overhead of multiple checksum calculations. \|\| ? (Seagate) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2584 LU-2584] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| LFSCK Phase 3 - DNE consistency \|\| Enhance LFSCK to work with DNE filesystems, including remote directory entries, and OST orphan handling for multiple MDTs. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2307 LU-2307] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .		\| LFSCK Phase 3 - DNE consistency \|\| Enhance LFSCK to work with DNE filesystems, including remote directory entries, and OST orphan handling for multiple MDTs. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2307 LU-2307] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\| DNE Phase IIb \|\| Asynchronous Commit of cross-MDT updates for improved performance. Remote rename and remote hard link functionality. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3534 LU-3534] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .		\| DNE Phase IIb \|\| Asynchronous Commit of cross-MDT updates for improved performance. Remote rename and remote hard link functionality. \|\| Richard Henwood (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3534 LU-3534] \|\| 2015-05 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Layout Enhancement \|\| Add support for multiple layouts on a single file, for File Level Replication, Data on MDT, extent-based layouts, etc. \|\| John Hammond (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3480 LU-3480] \|\| ~~2015~~-05 \|\| .		\| Layout Enhancement \|\| Add support for multiple layouts on a single file, for File Level Replication, Data on MDT, extent-based layouts, etc. \|\| John Hammond (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3480 LU-3480] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| ZFS ZIL Support \|\| Add support for the ZFS Intent Log (ZIL) to the Lustre osd-zfs \|\| Alex Zhuravlev (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4009 LU-4009] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\| File Level Replication Phase 2 \|\| Immediate asynchronous write from client. \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .		\| File Level Replication Phase 2 \|\| Immediate asynchronous write from client. \|\| Jinshan Xiong (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3254 LU-3254] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Data on MDT \|\| Allow small files to be stored directly on the MDT for reduced RPC count and improved performance. \|\| ? (Intel) \|\| . \|\| ~~2015~~-11 \|\| .		\| Data on MDT \|\| Allow small files to be stored directly on the MDT for reduced RPC count and improved performance. \|\| ? (Intel) \|\| . \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Dynamic LNET Config \|\| Introduces a user space script which will read routes from a config file and add those routes to LNET dynamically with the lctl utility. This allows the support of very large routing tables \|\| Amir Shehata (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2456 LU-2456] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .		\| Dynamic LNET Config \|\| Introduces a user space script which will read routes from a config file and add those routes to LNET dynamically with the lctl utility. This allows the support of very large routing tables \|\| Amir Shehata (Intel) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2456 LU-2456] \|\| 2014-11 \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting to a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ~~2015~~-05 \|\| .		\| Quota for Projects \|\| Allow specifying a "project" or "subtree" identifier for files for accounting to a project, separate from UID/GID. \|\| Shuichi Ihara (DDN) \|\| [https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4017 LU-4017] \|\| ????-?? \|\| .
	\|-		\|-
	\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .		\| Large Bulk IO \|\| Increase the OST bulk IO maximum size to 16MB or larger for more efficient disk IO submission. \|\| ? (Intel/DDN) \|\| . \|\| 2015-11 \|\| .