Jgmitter at 02:44, 29 July 2017

2017-07-29T02:44:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 28 July 2017
Line 59:		Line 59:
	<br />		<br />
	'''Next meeting will be on 2016-10-19'''		'''Next meeting will be on 2016-10-19'''

			[[Category:LWG]]

Jgmitter: Created page with "== Attendance == Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn
ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons
Indiana: Ken Rawlings
Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter..."

2016-10-17T14:30:15Z

Created page with "== Attendance == Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons Indiana: Ken Rawlings Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter..."

New page

== Attendance ==
Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn 
ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons 
Indiana: Ken Rawlings 
Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter Jones 

== Actions ==
'''New Actions Captured:''' 
*None

'''Existing Open Actions:''' 
*None

'''Actions Recently Closed:''' 
* None

== Minutes ==

'''2.9 Release Status/Update''' 
Peter 
*The number of blockers is slightly up from last week, however, some are just interop issues due to recent landings.
*The largest item to close out on is SSK development. There have been a number of suggestions for implementation change made by Intel security experts. Those changes have been made and are queued up for testing and landing.
*Anything else to report from the community?
**No word of any other focused 2.9 testing by the community due to other priorities.
 

'''2.10 Release Update''' 
Peter 
*Once we branch when reaching code freeze for 2.9, we can begin looking at 2.10 landings.
*There is a feature test plan template that cased be used for feature development in the 2.10 cycle.
 

'''Upstream Lustre Client''' 
James 
*The 4.9 release is going to be a 2.7 client equivalent. There was ~120 patch delta between 2.6 to 2.7.
*After the next merge window James is looking to try out 2.8 patches. James has had a rough look at ~1/4 of the code and there are ~40 patches thus far that will be needed.
*Will the kernel go to 4.10 numbering after 4.9?
**James: I believe that it will.
 

'''lustre.org''' 
Ken 
*The Mediawiki upgrade is occurring.
*We are getting close on the old wiki migration.
*There are about 70 old architecture documents and there is uncertainty about how to handle them. The current plan is to preserve them as static pages.
**Peter - I would be concerned about having stale references on the architecture page, but agree that we should keep it available. Perhaps the creation of a historical architecture documents area would be appropriate to retain the documents, but with a warning that data may be stale.
***All present agree.
 

'''Other Business''' 
*Sarp: organizational changes in OpenSFS
**We are now officially operating under a new set of bylaws and a new board composition.
**The new board consists only of Lustre users (no vendors).
**Sarp has accepted a role on the board and, therefore, is stepping away from the LWG co-chair role.
**Dustin Leverman of ORNL will be taking on the co-char role as Sarp’s replacement.
**A “save the date” announcement will be coming soon for LUG. The event will be hosted by Indiana University this year. More details to come in the announcement.
**A reminder that the OpenSFS board meetings are open to the public and anyone can attend that is interested.

 
'''Next meeting will be on 2016-10-19'''

LWG Minutes 2016-10-05 - Revision history

Jgmitter at 02:44, 29 July 2017

Jgmitter: Created page with "== Attendance == Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons Indiana: Ken Rawlings Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter..."

Jgmitter: Created page with "== Attendance == Cray: Cory Spitz, Ben Evans, Chris Horn
ORNL: Sarp Oral, James Simmons
Indiana: Ken Rawlings
Intel: Joe Gmitter, Andreas Dilger, Peter..."