CDWG Minutes 2014-04-10 - Revision history

Spitzcor at 15:49, 28 April 2014

2014-04-28T15:49:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 28 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability.		Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability.

	Release cadence/model didn’t see much discussion, b2_8 most likely next maintenance branch, but that is ~~TBDTesting and quality were big issues~~.		Release cadence/model didn’t see much discussion, b2_8 most likely next maintenance branch, but that is TBD.

			Testing and quality were big issues. A lot folks with large deployments really beat up the development, landing, test, and release process on the quality situation. Cory @Cray offered to share test regimen details for mix of open sourced tests like the LTP suite.

	A lot folks with large deployments really beat up the development, landing, test, and release process on the quality situation. Cory @Cray offered to share test regimen details for mix of open sourced tests like the LTP suite.		A large discussion centered on fostering the community by lowering the bar to development. We decided that we want a 'live design' document and process. The PAC is taking the first steps to define the live design doc process.


	A large discussion centered on fostering the community by lowering the bar to development.We decided that we want a 'live design' document and process. The PAC is taking the first steps to define the live design doc process.


	We also decided that we want high level docs in-tree. An action was generated to see if LID (Lustre Internals Documentation) project from lustre.org could be easily revived [Action with Hugo F.]		We also decided that we want high level docs in-tree. An action was generated to see if LID (Lustre Internals Documentation) project from lustre.org could be easily revived [Action with Hugo F.]


	CDWG recommends addressing technical debt with OpenSFS funds. We’ll enumerate ideas at future meetings.		CDWG recommends addressing technical debt with OpenSFS funds. We’ll enumerate ideas at future meetings.


	Future CDWG meetings to enumerate concrete steps to improve landing collateral (e.g. function and structure comments)items that need funding will be sent to the board.		Future CDWG meetings to enumerate concrete steps to improve landing collateral (e.g. function and structure comments)items that need funding will be sent to the board.

Spitzcor: Add notes

2014-04-28T15:43:28Z

Add notes

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:43, 28 April 2014
Line 1:	Line 1:
		[[Category:CDWG]]

		The meeting on 2014-04-10 was held in person at LUG2014.

		Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability.

		Release cadence/model didn’t see much discussion, b2_8 most likely next maintenance branch, but that is TBDTesting and quality were big issues.


		A lot folks with large deployments really beat up the development, landing, test, and release process on the quality situation. Cory @Cray offered to share test regimen details for mix of open sourced tests like the LTP suite.


		A large discussion centered on fostering the community by lowering the bar to development.We decided that we want a 'live design' document and process. The PAC is taking the first steps to define the live design doc process.


		We also decided that we want high level docs in-tree. An action was generated to see if LID (Lustre Internals Documentation) project from lustre.org could be easily revived [Action with Hugo F.]


		CDWG recommends addressing technical debt with OpenSFS funds. We’ll enumerate ideas at future meetings.


		Future CDWG meetings to enumerate concrete steps to improve landing collateral (e.g. function and structure comments)items that need funding will be sent to the board.

Spitzcor: Add notes

2014-04-28T15:43:24Z

Add notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:43, 28 April 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Category:CDWG]]~~

	~~The meeting on 2014-04-10 was held in person at LUG2014.~~

	~~Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability.~~

Morrone: Created page with "Category:CDWG The meeting on 2014-04-10 was held in person at LUG2014. Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability."

2014-04-23T21:44:57Z

Created page with "Category:CDWG The meeting on 2014-04-10 was held in person at LUG2014. Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability."

New page

[[Category:CDWG]]

The meeting on 2014-04-10 was held in person at LUG2014.

Discussion largely centered around improving the Lustre code stability and maintainability.