MD BMG: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[MD_BMG/roadmap|'''MPEE Proposed Roadmap''']] | [[MD_BMG/roadmap|'''MPEE Proposed Roadmap''']] | ||
<br /> | |||
* At SC'13 we will present results of running the 4 benchmark candidates on same system and compare their results to discuss their eligibility as proposed benchmarks of MPEE. | |||
<br /> | |||
[[MD_BMG/asks|'''MPEE Asks from OpenSFS''']] | [[MD_BMG/asks|'''MPEE Asks from OpenSFS''']] |
Revision as of 10:59, 6 September 2013
The task of the BWG Metadata Performance Evaluation Effort (MPEE) group is to:
- Build/select tools that will allow evaluation of File System Metadata performance and scalability
- The tools will help detect pockets of Metadata low performance in cases when users complain of extreme slowness of MD operations
- Benchmark tools will support: POSIX, MPI, and Transactional operations (for CEPH and DAOS)
- Address the very high end HPC as well as small and medium installations benchmark needs
- Tools applicable to Lustre and: CEPH, GPFS…
Current MPEE proposed list of benchmarks:
- At SC'13 we will present results of running the 4 benchmark candidates on same system and compare their results to discuss their eligibility as proposed benchmarks of MPEE.
- Share any open source synthetic benchmarks code
- Share a list of MD benchmark tools they currently use to allow select the most suitable and used candidates
- Share MD operations tested to allow build Netmist workload objects
- Share the MD workloads that create pain points to Lustre FS
- Share cases of poor MD performance workloads and applications
Return to [Benchmarking_Working_Group] page.