Contract SFS-DEV-002: Difference between revisions

From OpenSFS Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 46: Line 46:
= Meetings =
= Meetings =


== 2013-04-09 ==
Attending: Josh, John, Andrew, Steve, Nathan, Alex
<br/>
Meeting Minutes:
* Josh - working on config
* Andy - pushed fixes for Kerberos, working on test cases
<br/>
Actions:
* AI: Andreas to establish a git repo/branch hosted at Intel
<br/>
Milestones In Progress:
* Shared Keys CODE
* UID/GID Mapping CODE
<br/>
Next Meeting:
* skipping week of LUG; next meeting 12:00pm PST Apr 23 2013
* Intercall  (866) 203-7023
* Conference code: 5093670258
<br/>


== 2013-04-02 ==
== 2013-04-02 ==

Revision as of 12:23, 30 April 2013

Summary

Contract Work Item Scope statement Solution architecture High-level design Implementation Demonstration Delivery
SFS-DEV-002.1 UID/GID Mapping 2012-11-20 2013-01-08 2013-02-19 2013-03-12
SFS-DEV-002.2 Shared Key Auth 2012-11-20 2013-01-15 2013-02-19 2013-03-12

Documentation


Sample HLD:

Meetings

2013-04-09

Attending: Josh, John, Andrew, Steve, Nathan, Alex

Meeting Minutes:

  • Josh - working on config
  • Andy - pushed fixes for Kerberos, working on test cases


Actions:

  • AI: Andreas to establish a git repo/branch hosted at Intel


Milestones In Progress:

  • Shared Keys CODE
  • UID/GID Mapping CODE


Next Meeting:

  • skipping week of LUG; next meeting 12:00pm PST Apr 23 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-04-02

Attending: nathan, josh, andrew, steve, cory, alex, john

Meeting Minutes:

  • Github access available to PAC members - send keys to Josh
  • Andy trying to land fixes for current Lustre Kerberos LU-2392, LU-2384
  • Discussion on replay attacks - replay handling is included in ptlrpc, so we shouldn't need shared-key code specific fix.
    • Andreas points out problems with current ptlrpc, but Nathan and Andy's feeling is that this should not be part of the IU contract work. But we should file a Jira describing the problem.


Actions:

  • Simms to find reviewers for LU-2392 and LU-2384
  • Andy to test and land LU-2392 and LU-2384
  • Andy and Andreas to file a Jira about ptlrpc replay handling problems.


Milestones In Progress:

  • Shared Keys CODE
  • UID/GID Mapping CODE


Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Apr 09 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-03-26

Attending: Josh, Andy, Nathan, Ned, Steve, Alex

Meeting Minutes:

  • Github access available to PAC members - send keys to Andy
  • Andy has a fix for LU-2392 that he will attach to that ticket.
  • Andy needs reviews for above. Simms will ask PJones.
  • Andy wanted some direction for how to implement tests - Nathan pointed at sanity-sec.sh and sanity-gss.sh
  • Josh update: finishing up part 1 (map setup): module is complete, proc interface for maps, adding lctl writing config to mgs log
    • wants to work on local identity mapping (part 3) before map shipping (part 2)
  • Andy update: working on build and tests, has implemented null GSS flavor but not tested yet.


Actions:

  • Simms to find reviewers for Andy's version of LU-2392
  • Andy to post his fix for LU-2392 to that ticket
  • Andy to file a new ticket with Autoconf fix for libgssapi rename to libgssglue


Milestones In Progress:

  • Shared Keys CODE
  • UID/GID Mapping CODE


Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Apr 02 2013 unless otherwise cancelled
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-02-19

Attending: Andreas, Alex, Josh, Nathan, Ned, Steve

Meeting Minutes:

  • Shared Key HLD accepted
  • UID/GID Mapping HLD accepted
  • Coding phase should start now. We don't expect any useful results be next week, so we will cancel next week's meeting.
  • Nathan added latest versions of HLDs to wiki page.


Actions:

  • Josh and Andy to begin coding
  • Josh will send out link to GitHub repository
  • Josh will send email early next week with a status update, at which point we can plan for the next meeting


Milestones Completed:

  • Shared Keys HLD APPROVED 2013-02-19
  • UID/GID Mapping HLD APPROVED 2013-02-19


Next Meeting:

  • No meeting 2013-02-26, next meeting pending code progress.
  • 12:00pm PST Mar ?? 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-01-29

Attending: Andreas, Andy, Alex, Josh, Nathan, Ned

Meeting Minutes:

  • Key scope: sets of keys are defined per cluster (not per-client)
  • These keys are used to generate session keys for Auth and Encrypt
  • Root squash - various ideas
    1. EAs on directories describe which clusters are allowed
    2. Squash per-cluster roots to distinct users, use ACLs to provide per-cluster root-like permissions
    3. Use bind-mounting to limit the visibility of the fs to a subtree
    • suggestion to add root fid/path to cluster definition for future use
    • Current plan: root is not treated specially - per-cluster roots may be mapped to the actual fs root user, or not.
  • Object (OSS) security against untrusted client - out of scope
  • MGS primacy
    • "MGS up before before other servers" may be a requirement for the mapping or shared key features
    • but this requirement must be relaxed if the uid/shared key feature has not been enabled


Actions:

  • Nathan to send HLD example template (done)
  • Nathan to propose OpenSFS contract doc templates
  • Andy/Josh update HLD with detail

Milestones Under Review:

  • UID HLD
  • Shared Keys HLD

Next Meeting:

  • I will be travelling for the next two meetings (Feb 5, 12). Can someone else host the meeting?
  • 12:00pm PST Feb 5 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-01-22

Attending: Nathan, Josh, Andrew, Steve

Meeting Minutes:

  • Comments on Shared Keys HLD
  1. independence of auth and encrypt keys
  2. encrypt-then-MAC
  3. HLD should address multiple simultaneuous keys
  4. interaction between shared keys and mappings
    • original assumption was key-per-client; key-per-cluster seems to make more sense for a few reasons (large-cluster manageability, shared-root clients). A hash of the keys could be added to a cluster definition. A "null" cluster could be defined for a single-cluster environment.
  • Ended meeting early; we need more meeting attendees to discuss these issues.


Actions:

  • Review Security HLD to provide timely feedback.


Milestones Under Review:

  • UID HLD
  • Shared Keys HLD

Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Jan 29 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-01-15

Attending: Nathan, Ned, Josh, Andrew, Steve, Alex, Andreas, John

Meeting Minutes:

  • UID/GID HLD Review
    • Comments by Nathan, Andreas, Ned returned via Word doc
Define/update cluster definition via complete file vs. incrementally
Josh: file-based cluster def changes requires walking export tree
Done rarely, probably ok
There may be security implications at the transition when redefining cluster defs
When a NID is removed from a def it should use the default mapping
Define/update UID/GID mappings via complete file vs. incrementally
incremental uid/gid mapping in order to prevent fs access blocking during replacement.
Andreas suggested atomically swap in new mapping once received/set up.
Behaviour during setup and recovery
Don't use default mapping while waiting for definitions; FS should block access to all files until mappings and cluster defs have been set up.
Need a clear signal when an update is finished/complete.
Servers currently cache the MGS Lustre config locally
May be undesirable for OSD
Perhaps this behaviour should be changed: stop caching, require MGS for server startup.
  • Shared Key HLD distributed
    • Comments should be returned quickly for HLD revision next week.


Actions:

  • Review Shared Key HLD to provide timely feedback.


Milestones Under Review:

  • UID HLD
  • Shared Keys HLD

Milestones Completed:

  • Shared Key Scope Statement APPROVED 2013-01-15

Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Jan 22 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2013-01-08

Attending: Nathan, Ned, Josh, Andrew, Steve, Dave, Alex

Meeting Minutes:

  • Clarifying current documents:
    • Latest Shared Keys doc: arch doc. HLD expected this week.
    • Latest UID-GID doc: HLD.
  • We need reviewers for both HLDs.
    • UID-GID:
      • Nathan has already sent comments
      • Ned volunteers
      • I'd like to volunteer Andreas in absentia
    • Shared Keys:
      • Not out yet; any eager volunteers?
  • Document types: I think the consensus going forward is Google Docs for easier collaboration/feedback.

Actions:

  • Andrew to deliver HLD be the end of this week (hopefully)
  • Reviews to provide timely feedback.


Milestones Under Review:

  • UID HLD
  • Shared Keys Solution Arch

Milestones Completed:

  • UID/GID Scope Statement APPROVED 2013-01-08

Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Jan 15 2013
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2012-12-11

Attending: Nathan, Andreas, Josh, Simms, Cory, Alex, Andrew Meeting Minutes:

  • Josh and Andrew updated the arch docs with improved use cases, test plan, and acceptance criteria
  • Several PAC members commented on the updates
  • Alex noted we neglected to address previous discussions on allowing multiple simultaneous keys:
    • should we allow key updates on a live system, or connect-time only?
    • is there any upper limit on total keys?
    • should keys be restricted to particular nid range?

Actions:

  • PAC members review docs for final approval by next week.
  • The above multiple-key use case should be added to the arch doc.
  • In the meantime HLD design can begin


Milestones Under Review:

  • UID Solution Arch
  • Shared Key Solution Arch

Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Dec 18 2012
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258

No meetings on Dec 25 or Jan 1.


2012-12-04

Attending: Nathan, Ned, Josh, Simms, Carrier Meeting Minutes:

  • Solution Architecture document review. More detail requested in
    • Practical use case (UID)
    • Specific functional requirements (shared key)
    • Detailed, specific acceptance criteria (e.g. "Any single user on up to 100(?) separate clusters has Unix UID/GID-controlled access to his files on shared Lustre file system.", "Unknown users can be squashed to a particular UID." etc.)

Actions:

  • Josh and Andrew to revise Solution Architecture docs with more detail.


Milestones Under Review:

  • UID Solution Arch
  • Shared Keys Solution Arch

Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Dec 11 2012
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258


2012-11-20

Attending: Nathan, Alex, Andreas, Steve, Cory

Meeting Minutes:

  • Simms requested approval of the two scope statements as presented in email 2012-11-10. No objections were raised, and the scope statements were approved.

Actions:

  • Simms et all will begin work on the Solution Architecture.

Milestones Under Review:

  • none

Milestones Completed:

  • UID/GID Scope Statement APPROVED 2012-11-20
  • Shared Key Scope Statement APPROVED 2012-11-20

Next Meeting:

  • 12:00pm PST Nov 27 2012
  • Intercall (866) 203-7023
  • Conference code: 5093670258