Difference between revisions of "BWG File System Monitoring"

From OpenSFS
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
# identify their capabilities, any any others we think should exist.
 
# identify their capabilities, any any others we think should exist.
 
# compare and contrast the tools to each other and the capabilities we think should exist.
 
# compare and contrast the tools to each other and the capabilities we think should exist.
 +
  
 
[[BWG_FSM_Features_List|The Features List]] so far.
 
[[BWG_FSM_Features_List|The Features List]] so far.
Line 10: Line 11:
 
[[BWG_FSM_IO_Process_Model|An IO Process Model]] to get an idea of the space of variables that are usefully monitored.
 
[[BWG_FSM_IO_Process_Model|An IO Process Model]] to get an idea of the space of variables that are usefully monitored.
  
 +
 +
Status-ey Stuff
 
* LUG 2013 Report (final ppt).
 
* LUG 2013 Report (final ppt).
 
* [[BWG_FSM_Report_SC13|SC13 Report]] (in development).
 
* [[BWG_FSM_Report_SC13|SC13 Report]] (in development).

Revision as of 12:26, 26 July 2013

The task of the BWG File System Monitoring group is to:

  1. develop a list of existing parallel filesystem monitoring tools.
  2. identify their capabilities, any any others we think should exist.
  3. compare and contrast the tools to each other and the capabilities we think should exist.


The Features List so far.

The Tools List so far.

An IO Process Model to get an idea of the space of variables that are usefully monitored.


Status-ey Stuff

  • LUG 2013 Report (final ppt).
  • SC13 Report (in development).


Return to Benchmarking Working Group page.