Automation framework evaluation: Difference between revisions

From OpenSFS Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|-
|-
| [https://github.com/autotest/autotest autotest]  
| [https://github.com/autotest/autotest autotest]  
It is designed primarily totest the Linux kernel, though it is useful for many other functions such asqualifying new hardware. It's an open-source project under the GPL and is usedand developed by a number of organizations, including Google, IBM, Red Hat, andmany others.
It is designed primarily totest the Linux kernel, though it is useful for many other  
functions such asqualifying new hardware. It used and developed by a number of  
organizations, including Google, IBM, Red Hat, andmany others.
||  
||  
* ready for work linux kernel, supports some logging services and crashdump
* ready for work linux kernel, supports some logging services and crashdump

Revision as of 10:45, 16 December 2012

Framework(with link) Advantages Disadvantages
autotest

It is designed primarily totest the Linux kernel, though it is useful for many other functions such asqualifying new hardware. It used and developed by a number of organizations, including Google, IBM, Red Hat, andmany others.

  • ready for work linux kernel, supports some logging services and crashdump
  • under active developemnt
  • could work in "client" mode with minimum setup

in server mode:

  • ready to work set of nodes and selecting nodes based on mark/lables
  • have jobs queue supports
  • very limited test selection, include list, exclude list, tagging support
  • have pretty simple web UI
  • test structure pretty complex
STAF Example Example
robotframework Example Example