2015-06-01 Protocols Document meeting minutes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
* | * Olaf Faaland (LLNL) | ||
* | * Chris Horn (Cray) | ||
* Andrew Uselton (Intel) | * Andrew Uselton (Intel) | ||
* Doug Ouchareck (Intel) | * Doug Ouchareck (Intel) | ||
* Andreas Dilger (Intel) | * Andreas Dilger (Intel) | ||
* | * Peter Jones (Intel) | ||
* | * Richard Henwood (Intel) | ||
* Chris Morrone (LLNL) | * Chris Morrone (LLNL) | ||
* Ruth Klundt (Sandia) | |||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
=== Brief status === | |||
Since last meeting, a patch has been provided by Mike. Andreas, Doug, Jinshan have provided reviews: | |||
http://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/project:doc/protocol | |||
=== Expectations of Gerrit review and project workflow. === | === Expectations of Gerrit review and project workflow. === | ||
The purpose of this discussion is about improving transparency for this project. It is difficult for observers to have an overview on project progress. | |||
AR: Andrew to include more information in the commit message singling to viewers to patch status: Known issues, provenance of the information. | |||
AR: Richard to assist getting timely reviews for Andrew. | |||
=== What can we accomplish with weekly meetings? === | === What can we accomplish with weekly meetings? === | ||
They are valuable tool while the project works through current progress concerns. | |||
=== Other business. === | === Other business. === | ||
With no other business, meeting adjourned at 13:22 CST. | |||
Latest revision as of 14:05, 1 June 2015
Attendees
- Olaf Faaland (LLNL)
- Chris Horn (Cray)
- Andrew Uselton (Intel)
- Doug Ouchareck (Intel)
- Andreas Dilger (Intel)
- Peter Jones (Intel)
- Richard Henwood (Intel)
- Chris Morrone (LLNL)
- Ruth Klundt (Sandia)
Agenda
Brief status
Since last meeting, a patch has been provided by Mike. Andreas, Doug, Jinshan have provided reviews:
http://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/project:doc/protocol
Expectations of Gerrit review and project workflow.
The purpose of this discussion is about improving transparency for this project. It is difficult for observers to have an overview on project progress.
AR: Andrew to include more information in the commit message singling to viewers to patch status: Known issues, provenance of the information.
AR: Richard to assist getting timely reviews for Andrew.
What can we accomplish with weekly meetings?
They are valuable tool while the project works through current progress concerns.
Other business.
With no other business, meeting adjourned at 13:22 CST.